5 entries were submitted between 2015-03-22 12:00:00 and 2015-03-28 00:00:00. 6 ratings were given to 5 entries (100.0%) between 2015-03-28 00:00:00 and 2015-03-29 23:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 1.2 and the median was 1.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Gameplay (How well does it play?) | #1 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Ease of use (Was it wasy to get running? If the game is browser based, this does not apply) | #1 | 5.000 | 5.000 |
| Story (How was the story?) | #1 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Aesthetics (How does it look?) | #1 | 5.000 | 5.000 |
| Overall | #1 | 4.500 | 4.500 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Ease of use (Was it wasy to get running? If the game is browser based, this does not apply) | #1 | 5.000 | 5.000 |
| Gameplay (How well does it play?) | #4 | 2.000 | 2.000 |
| Story (How was the story?) | #4 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| Aesthetics (How does it look?) | #4 | 2.000 | 2.000 |
| Overall | #4 | 2.500 | 2.500 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Ease of use (Was it wasy to get running? If the game is browser based, this does not apply) | #1 | 5.000 | 5.000 |
| Aesthetics (How does it look?) | #4 | 2.000 | 2.000 |
| Story (How was the story?) | #4 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| Gameplay (How well does it play?) | #5 | 1.500 | 1.500 |
| Overall | #5 | 2.375 | 2.375 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Gameplay (How well does it play?) | #2 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Aesthetics (How does it look?) | #2 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Story (How was the story?) | #2 | 2.000 | 2.000 |
| Overall | #2 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Ease of use (Was it wasy to get running? If the game is browser based, this does not apply) | #4 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Gameplay (How well does it play?) | #2 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Aesthetics (How does it look?) | #2 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Story (How was the story?) | #2 | 2.000 | 2.000 |
| Overall | #2 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Ease of use (Was it wasy to get running? If the game is browser based, this does not apply) | #4 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
