Hey Stewart, I still remember an effect I learned about in my previous economics class, the Matthew effect, which refers to the accumulation of advantages happening faster when someone already has some advantages. When I combine this with the principles of wealth distribution that you've studied, it becomes clear that, for the remaining 95% of the population, catching up with the top 5% is nearly impossible. Additionally, I understand that relying solely on policies or expecting the wealthiest individuals to help the majority of the poor may not be a feasible solution. Your approach to fostering empathy seems to be a very promising way to address this problem