Judge feedback

Judge feedback is anonymous and shown in a random order.

• No idea how this can relate to roguelikes. Even looking at it as a game not related to roguelikes - no idea how I'm supposed to make assumptions about some items... There is not enough information! Well, I can just memorize... But then there are only 3 levels. This game leaves "Uh? What was that?" feeling...

• A very intriguing attempt to subvert the roguelike genre!  I really enjoyed the variety of neat reasons provided for the unusual transactions.

  Completeness:  Solid and stable

  Aesthetics: An interesting thing to judge.  The "bad" UI is part of the charm of this sort of work-game.  My complaint here may be it wasn't taken far enough - the g-codes allows highlighting, but I was looking for weird meta-g-codes to allow flagging, or to allow teleporting to other lines via search (to avoid grid bugs) or what not.  This could make it suddenly a multi-dimensional game of how to flag what you see with fewest commands.  Currently it is very one-dimensional as you have the solitary axis of movement.

  Fun:  Unfortunately, the game is balanced way too easily.  The bad transactions are obvious.  Too much time is available to complete it.  While the elbereth/grid bug interaction is interesting, you don't require it to finish the game.

  Innovation: Very cool departure from the norm; but holds back enough to let us still see the roguelike source.  I like the whole  idea that the current line is "me", but I'm also the operator...

  Scope: Very limited set.  I would have loved to have more RNG in the items to make it harder to tell correct from fake, and more g-codes.

  Roguelikeness:  Lack of 2d motion really prevents it from being a true roguelike disguised as a ledger.  The grid bugs, though, bring it from the abyss of non-roguelike into a roguelike world by causing the spreadsheet to suddenly become a 2d cave complex....