Judge feedback

Judge feedback is anonymous and shown in a random order.

• It's a sweet game and the art work is lovely. I struggle to figure out what to do in the game, it doesn't seem to be a lot of content just yet. But it looks very nice!
• Fantastic art, both in terms of concept an execution! Great name as well.
• A great concept which puts the messaging central - but without the completed minigames it's difficult to judge playability. The art style was nice and clear - easy to see how this could be developed. It is feasible but again needs considered based on the lack of minigame progress. The originality is the combination of art, messaging and there is a bit of a 50s sci-fi vibe which I quite liked.
• Very well put together art style and introduction, super polished and professional looking. Focus on the narrative/messaging is great but unfortunately lack of gameplay implemented as a result
• A really nicely built game that fit the brief well with strong messaging and good feasibility. The art was appealing and well considered. More originality and some deeper gameplay mechanics could have enhanced the overall game.
• More of an infographic at the moment rather than a game. Scores for playability and feasibility were reduced as the mini-game elements are yet to be designed and completed. Really strong visuals and graphics that we could see working to give the right branding and messaging for the company. We can see potential opportunity for each minigame to tell a different element of the CCS process and this would have strengthened the submission. We also liked that the world it was built in provided opportunities to link to other low carbon technologies as background pieces such as electric vehicles and district heating.