Thank you for participating in the Jam & Toast game jam. Congrats on becoming a finalist as well. I've played your game and wanted to offer some thoughts based on my playthrough that might help you improve the game if you choose to develop it further.

Before that, though, I want to say that I found the game to be fun. I like tile laying games and found this to be a unique experience compared to the other titles in addition to this. I also really appreciated having everything preloaded as a Workshop mod in Steam for TTS. That made my life a lot easier and made me more excited to play the game as a player.

However, there were a few things that would have improved my experience. The first is pretty simple and that's a play example with pictures. I would have loved to have seen a completed board showing how the ant path, how many ants were left, and how final scoring worked based on that image. I was able to figure this stuff out on my own, but an example would still have been appreciated (I had to reread a few things to make sure I wasn't messing up, like how the ants only need a single-die wide tile of space to move).

The other minor issue I encountered had to do with the bonus point food tokens. The contrast on the words and/or numbers on some of the foods made them very difficult to read. The worst offenders are the kiwi and the lemon. Adding a dark outline to the text or something would solve this problem, but I would take the time to update that when the jam is over at a minimum.

Otherwise, like I said, had fun and enjoyed your game. Thank you once again for participating in the jam. Hope you had fun creating this!

Thank you for submitting to the Jam & Toast game jam! I hope you had as much fun making your game as I did playing it. I'd like to take a moment to offer some feedback and suggestions privately based on my experience with the game should you choose to adjust or further develop it in the future.

First off, I found the game to be fairly fun once I understood the rules. My main point of criticism is that the rulebook is a little confusing. I wasn't sure how utensils worked, for example, and had to read the rules a couple of times over before I really understood how they worked.

Two things would help improve clarity in the future:

1. I'd ask someone else to proofread the rules and ask you questions on anything they might be confused on. This might seem obvious and you maybe even did this already, but having a few people do this would help catch things you might have missed or didn't consider. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but English didn't seem like your first language and that likely contributed to what I was feeling if it was the case.
2. A play example would be really helpful. If you "played" a hypothetical floor of the game with a picture or two, this would also help players understand how everything works.

That's really the only "negative" I have for you. The cards are clean, I was able to intuit how a lot of things worked, and the encounters are just different enough for a short experience. You have a modular design so this could easily be expanded or built upon if desired, which is something I love to see.

Keep up the good work and thank you once again for participating in the jam!

Thank you for submitting to the Jam & Toast game jam! I hope you had a lot of fun making this game because I enjoyed playing it. I wanted to provide some private feedback here outside of my public comment to offer you advice and opinions based on my experience with the game in case you choose to develop it further or make another game.

To start, I really like the theme. It's great and the cards are all fairly clear in how they work. Having more of them would add a lot of variety and nearly endless replayability either as scenarios or expansions to this base experience. A modular design is great to have, and you do!

However, I did find the Truth Fragments to be slightly annoying. I really wish they weren't quite as punishing as many of them would cause me to instantly loose the game if I accepted them. I would consider instead changing to this kind of design philosophy for the future:  tradeoffs.

What I mean by that is offering the player choices like this:

Gain something for free (a single stat or sanity point)

OR

Gain multiple things (two stats or one and a sanity or two sanity, etc...) but it comes at a price (-1 to a skill or sanity), as an example.

If the player chooses to deny the fragment, they should always get something for free but it's minor (+1). Sanity is the easy option.

This would feel more balanced from a player perspective and offer more interesting choices. Of course, a few "unbalanced" and punishing cards are totally OK, but less would benefit the game.

Otherwise, I found the experience to be pretty solid. Thank you once again for your submission!