Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

According to the license, an user can remix the project and distribute it under this condition: as long as he gives credit to the original creator and doesn’t claim the game to be his own (and also sharing the same license, but he at least made the game free unlike other cases). Red wing didn’t follow the attribution conditions, he didn’t give credit and even erased my name on the game swapping by his, claiming my game to be his own.

According to https://creativecommons.org/misuse-of-works/ , I can still send a takedown notice for misuse of the creative commons license (not giving credit & claiming the game to be his own), the user can contest the takedown and give a second look to the material (but there was enough proof that he stole my stuff and removed my name from the thumbnails anyways). It also says to notify the thief before taking action, which is what I and other people did (basically called him out), however I tought that he was inactive since his last posts where posted +100 days ago.

The thief did indeed apologize (“chat GPT write me an apology email for stealing his stuff”), but he still has the other stolen content up on his page (he didn’t only steal my stuff), which it clearly says that he just didn’t want to have consequences since I noticed his stolen work (he could possibly be just a bot aswell).

Even if it says that I can takedown creative commons material, the stuff has been taken down already, so I’m now trying to cancel the DMCA takedown request (I didn’t proceed further that the 1st step because of a paywall but anyways).

Correct me if I’m wrong, I’m still new to this copyright stuff

provided the license agreement is followed

As I wrote.

You also talked about putting disclaimers on your work that might violate the license.

Copyright and Software licenses are related but not the same. You have copyright without using a license. But the particular license you are forced to use by publishing on Scratch gives anyone so much rights that for many intents and purposes you have no copyright - provided they follow the license rules. Because you literally cannot hinder anyone from copying your stuff.

Hitting the repot button on a page with "Uploader not authorized to distribute" is one thing. But going through the actual dmca process another. If you need to do such things, make sure, it is the correct legal tool. 

Since the pages were taken down, the immedate "takedown" already took place. Remember, the people talking here are not lawyers. Legal consultations cost money. It is personal opinion and observations you will get here. You wanted the copy down, it is down. The actual dmca takedown is for situations when someone refuses to take it down.

So good luck with getting on top of google again. But the license you are using will not prevent this from happening again should the license be followed, to get on topic again.

One can attribute a project on Itch with a license, but it might be that this particular license is not allowed on Itch - for a game. Assets can have some of those cc licenses and you can say that a game you have has assets with a cc license and you are probably required to, hence the possiblitly to attribute those licenses.