Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(1 edit)

Around 1994, yes. W and L have been conversational terms for "a good thing happened" and "a bad thing happened" (a win or loss originally) since 2012 at the latest, but probably didn't become something almost everyone who speaks english would recognize until around 2015 or so. Its only become more popular since, and the terms originally come from labeling columns in competitive scoring (W/L/D, win loss draw) for games and matches for.... well centuries. The original meme phrase was 'add one to the win column' or any variation thereof, but eventually shortened to 'get a w' or 'take an l' situationally, and from there just became W and L without explanation because most people don't need it.


Edit: but I should clarify, shortening words to just one letter only became highly popular among the general population in 1994. More generally its been around for about 12000 years, and some examples can be seen sumerian and akkadian clay tablets written in cuneiform. It was 1994 when people started using pagers and the internet to commonly communicate and typing on them was even more of a hassle than caligraphy for the people of that time period, to whom computers and cellular phones were strange technology they were begrudgingly forced to use. 


Winston Churchill is the first known user of OMG, in a telegraph, during WWII, (and the telegraph operator had to explain to the recipient that it meant oh my god). Other forms of shorthand have been in common use by stenographers for around as long as people have been using the latin alphabet. Most scribes copying manuscripts in the 1400s or so for example, would write 'a' in place of 'and' and many other similar single letter substitutions, and in fact this is the origin of the apostrophe, which literally means "there is supposed to be one or more letters in this word and I choose not to write them."

Before that we simply wrote Johns instead of John's (the apostrophe to denote possession is actually due to a centuries old uncorrected mistake that became the new correct).

Mucho texto

I see . So you were trying to prove that I'm wrong in every way or something? When peoples are in hurry , like when they are chatting online or if they need to type a buch of text like you did , then shortening isn't deal at all. But when its 3-5 words sentence it just looks lazy. But I'm not judging anyone though and didn't do it in my previous comment. I just wanted to know the news

Not at all. I'm just a massive nerd. Maybe slightly bothered by the tone of the comment, it was late at night. But generally speaking I'm filled with way too much trivia and find it amusing to give an absurdly detailed response to a question that probably wasn't even serious. No hard feelings.  Probably best not to ever consider anything in a comment section too seriously in general really. 

But the fact is the moment I considered how someone would answer it as if it were a serious question, I realized written laziness is probably the oldest invention in the history of writing... aside from writing. I actually do find that very interesting personally. Also a correction, it may have been babylonian rather than akkadian I was thinking of, but I'd have to look it up.

If you'll allow a tangent, 'okay' is an expansion of 'OK' which is an abbreviation for 'oll korrect' which in turn is very clearly an intentional misspelling of 'all correct.' Its really not relevant in context here, but it is a form of abbreviation and I find it to likewise be an interesting story. Goodbye has similar origins, stemming from 'God be with ye' and occasionally 'good be ye.' 

So. While I was being somewhat obtuse, I meant no harm really, and I'll wish you, 

Goodbye.

(+1)

Well that's five minutes of my life I'll never get back. 

you are a bread, you dont have a life bsjsjsjs

(+1)

correct