She isn't your girl tho? And whether she continues her prostitution after she becomes an LI remains to be seen, so no tag needed for the moment.
To my knowledge the MC can sleep with chika before seeing her with the client at the hotel?
I've seen another person comment this.
So is she an LI or not?
If she is then it is NTR.
I admit i haven't played 0.3 yet.
And the self deconstruction from both the comments and KS make me want to avoid this gem turned dumpster fire.
You can. But there was no romantic advances or any indication that there will be at that point. If anything choosing to sleep with her at that specific point is an outright creep move. Complete, utter fumble. There's a reason if you choose to do so, you unlock the scene but you don't get +relation points.
Is she an LI or not?
Good question. Depends on how you view it. It is because of the intro that we have the impression she is a possible LI. If that wasn't there you'd view her as a side character and most these people complaining won't even give two hoots that she sells herself.
Yes, knowing her past isn't great and its nothing to brag about. But, the character was a victim of circumstance and it is your role as the MC to take the responsible path of helping her (presumably).
If you think her past knowing the context is still a done deal, not a problem, KS isn't forcing you onto her lmao. As I mentioned in one of the other comments, as of 0.3 virtually 90% of her dialogue choices is proceeding or ending her route. All these people raging in the comments cucking themselves.
And please, next time don't start correcting the author and its playerbase when you haven't even played the update. Its perfectly fine if the whole onset theme is not for you. But rage baiting when not knowing is a sign of immaturity, something the game does seem to reveal in much of the comment section.
*Additionally, Netorare/ri/rase only applies when the character is in a relationship. You can feel free to tag her as a prostitute or whore or whatever you like, but its not NTR. Hence, wrong tag.