Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(1 edit)

I'm sure it's true for many. For others, they are aware it's not required but appreciate/hope for it. But they'd rather make it easy to use their assets than require it and end up not being used or being a burden to creators. So yeah, it'd be cool. Not required, just cool.

PS: feel free to delete this comment thread, thank you for reading but I don't want to make the comment section of your game annoying for others.

I fully understand what you mean. But i think we should make it a trend to put the licence that actually fits what you want. I want people that want credit to use a licence that requires you to give it, for me CC0 is not that type. We need to make it social accepted to use license that give you what you want, instead of making it easy for the user who uses it. Its not easy if you lisence says one thing and you hope for something else, it't not helping. What's the point with an license then? If you want credit there is soooo many licenses that make sure you get!

I am not irritated or someting. I would add credit to them all if they had that type of licence, but for me it destroys the purpose of the licence. Especially that licence because it is so open it can be!

If it was a lisence that at least recommended it sure, but It don't!