Post by MooseAuChocolat in Up scalling in Unity

Viewing post in Up scalling in Unity

I am fairly certain that "Pixel Snapping" is required, otherwise you would have pixel movement that is much smoother than 84x48.

Edit: Upscaling is superior in my opinion, I made a short video demonstrating the differences.

Toscan03 years ago

Maybe, i don't know :/ . First time dealing with resolution..

Sorry883 years ago

I actually think maybe upscale render texture would be also good

Toscan03 years ago

By reading the guide line aguen, i think upscale render texture makes more sense than the Pixel Snapping

MooseAuChocolat3 years ago

I concur. Pixel Snapping caused the pixels to snap into position during movement but scaling them still caused sub-pixel rendering. If an Upscaled Render Texture works for your project I would use it.

Toscan03 years ago

Honestly, i can't see any difference with them on or off. Even if i remove the Pixel Perfect Camera, i don't see any diference. I think that is because i'm using the same ration, my res is basicly the same but 10x bigger. Meaning i have the "same pixels but larger".

I can be wrong, idk :/

MooseAuChocolat3 years ago

I made a short video demonstrating the differences.

The squares of the gray grid in the background are 1px each, 84x48 upscaled to 840x480. The left side is the scene view, the right one the game view.

Without Upscaling or Pixel Snapping: the pixel perfect component has essentially no effect besides changing the cameras size.
With Pixel Snapping: scaling the sprite still won't cause the entire pixel to be filled, moving works fine though.
With Upscaled Render texture: both scaling and moving the sprite fills the entire pixel.

itch.io

Viewing post in Up scalling in Unity