Yes, very native and very proficient. My statement does make sense. If you are not native and have a question I can explain further. And for the record its quite obviously you that is not native to the language. As for age it is completely irrelevant nor was there anything immature or "old sounding" about my post so I guess its some sort of insult or something. I find people that use age, language proficiency, and or spelling/grammar as some vector of attack are almost always the people insecure about their own.
As for my statement you said :
"And not a loss because I got a couple hundred games on Steam that I have yet to play."
FYI that isn't a complete sentence in English. I sometimes tutor people for TOEFL exams so if you need an explanation, ask. Anyways in response to that I said "Not playing this is your loss 100% of the time" as in you not playing this is always your loss. You lose not playing.
"So actually it is good because it keeps me from buying yet another game I may never get around to playing."
Another bad sentence. In this sentence all the bold words reference the same thing, this game. The issue here is IT (Hero's Hour) keeps you from buying yet another game (Also hero's hour) While most people would understand you, as I did, if you were in a testing environment for proficiency it would incorrect.
I end my statement saying, "not the other way around" which is a way to refer to the opposite of what i just said, which in this refers to your proclamation this isn't a loss for you.
here is another example:
"Although it may seem as though an old dress from the 1960s should be considerably less expensive than a brand new modern dress, it’s actually the other way around."
Cheers.