This isn't good.
More effort must be made to clarify what must be considered "educational" and what should be considered "glorify".
If I correctly understood the intentions of the starter of this thread, the main goal of this thread is to "clarify the meaning" of the two above mentioned words, and that still didn't happen. We need here people who can do philosophy and lawyer-speak.
For example what about games, where the protagonist is the villain, but feels bad for the victims, and is actually forced to do evil in order to survive? And what about brainwashing, hypnotism, mind-control, multiple personality disorder and similar things, if they happen with the villain, and not with the victim? This is very complicated, as there are many games with very complicated stories.
Edit: Also, I must add that there are games, which doesn't have a story, or have a story that doesn't make any sense at all. What about those games? How could it be decided whether they can be considered educational???