Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
Tags
(+8)(-1)

Maybe in the past? Its not like washing yourself now a days is hard to do. If you dont like the look of uncut thats fine, but all that "It gets infected easily" stuff does not hold as much water now a days as it used to. 

(-16)

Actually its still a thing, plus its ugly, its healthier to be cut, its a useless flap of skin that is no longer needed, modern men still get sick from forgetting to wash it, it serves no purpose.

(+2)

Exactly the same with male nipples. They serve no purpose so you better get rid of them.

(+3)

Nipleless blacksmith

(1 edit) (+6)

Actually... It does serve a purpose. Same kind that a mammal's sheath does: Protect the most sensitive portion of the penis (the glans for us) from abrasion and such. Circumsized, or more properly, mutilated males have lower sensitivity in the glans for this reason.

Secondly, those who get ill, do so  from not washing... Which isn't any more tedious than washing one's pits (which I would hope nobody finds tedious). So long as one washes, which literally just takes some clean water, infection rate is near zero.

It being "ugly" is purely your opinion. I find them quite fetching, myself.

The ideas behind circumcision are primarily tradition, a disgusting one started by an equally vile man by the name of Kelogg. Learn your history and actually check/investigate studies rather than allow them to confirm your bias.

Also, if this was "just an observation" you'd have stopped after the first rejection.

(-13)

Plus washing it is tedious too

(-13)

We are just better off without it