This puts enough uncertainty in the air, I apologize for being rash, the original context inspired it, I'd like to hear more about this "investor" considering I thought us patreons were the "investors"
i can understand that but i hope you can also understand that the two games the report is mentioning are fundamentally different if it were to go to court i don't see the attacking team winning at all without copywrite on game mechanic or an idea we all know what crazy taxi did with its arrow there has to be hard evidence like code being reused from your game and such and such what there needs to be from both sides is showing what happened the whole truth instead of throwing accusations to one another for example strange girl being vague could be due to a legal side or legal battle that might happen as most lawyers advise little to no contact with anyone
please hold this to more scrutiny from what i know both sides really don't have anything in this image we don't actually know if its real screenshot or not i seen faked screenshots of other people i wouldn't put past anyone if a fake screenshot as for strange girls vagueness its probably because they are getting advice from legal team i would like some hard evidence showing this is infact strange girl and not someone posing as them if you like example of someone not backing up their claims with any truth to them just look towards J.A.R (just a robot) they had something like this come up and they had to prove it by going live and clicking on the persons dms to show he had not done this showing it was infact a poser both sides can be little clearer but seeing how strange girls acting we won't get any word from them untill they are legally allowed to disclose details and with hot pink all they shown are words a testimony if you will they don't hold any real water because there's no foundation and they are just vauge as strange girl is