Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
Tags

Did I say anything at all about you using profanity? No, I didn't, I simply pointed out the fact that you're being toxic as well, which points towards being mentally unstable.

As far as the two accounts being the same person, I have noticed differences in spelling and grammar between the two. Greatchad22 refused to correct his improper spelling of "loser" due to having spelled it "looser" for so long his autocorrect would have to be retaught, which the account here has actually spelled correctly. Greatchad22 also refused to admit his mistakes, which Chad23 here did as soon as it was pointed out to him with screenshot proof. Granted, both accounts have very similar names, but does that mean that you also run all of the other accounts with Callihan in the name, since you have a number in your account name? Probably not, but following your logic my question wouldn't be unreasonable, even if it seems that way.

My point is, don't fight toxicity with more toxicity. That's never going to work, and will likely only serve to further enrage both of you, making the vicious circle repeat itself until either one or both of you simply get tired of looking for crap to argue about or get banned. Even if someone is being toxic, it doesn't take much effort to be the bigger man and word your posts to be constructive instead of destructive. Or even better yet, to simply stay out of the conversation if it doesn't involve you.

(1 edit)

You're not even being anywhere near intellectually honest here, and really just grasping at straws.  There is a difference between taking a firm assertive stance on a particular case or example, as compared to just running a bunch of illegible profanities together after one has ranted about things not even germane to the subject or in this case not even in the game.

As for staying out of conversions, quite an interesting and rather broad stroke of the brush considering you have decided to interject yourself into our conversion.  Wouldn't you agree?  But then again, the whole intellectual dishonesty thing that you've got going on here.  It tends to have that effect on many.

And as I have already pointed out, this is a public comment page.  Nobody needs or requires your express permission to post here and as such I will continue to do so.  And really, there's nothing you can do about it.

Apologies for the late reply, work has been insane the past few days. What part of my comment makes you believe I'm grasping at straws? Also, the only thing I saw in your post that you're taking a firm stance on is  attempting to associate two accounts to the same person with only the circumstantial evidence of similar account name and the fact that the grammar and punctuation is similar as well. As I pointed out, Greatchad22 refused to correct his improper spelling of "loser", and Chad23 did in fact spell it correctly. Also, Chad23 did in fact acknowledge the fact that he made an incorrect assumption once evidence was given to disprove said assumption, which Greatchad22 never did.

And as for your second point, it was you who initially interjected into the discussion between Chad23 and myself. In light of this fact, my addressing you directly should have been anticipated, much like it would have been if you decided to interrupt two people in the real world.

As far as this being a public comment page, and you not needing permission to post, you are absolutely correct. You don't need permission from anyone to post a comment in this public forum. However, you seem to have misunderstood the point I was making in my previous post. If you actually take the last sentence of my post and apply the context of the previous sentence, the point I was attempting to convey was that it doesn't take much effort to simply stay out of the conversation if you have nothing to contribute other than belittling others. Providing constructive criticism or help to others is far more appreciated than belittling them or simply ranting, don't you agree?