Even though it's not accurate (after all that's why we have terms like Game designer, artist, developer and so on), but I don't find it wrong when someone working in a game development (not as a programmer) call him/herself a Game Developer, as I said it can be associated as a broader term as well.
Edit: These are just semantics, and they tend to change over time
Well, the guy making this thread tried to include reviewers of games...
English might not be my native language, but the internet is english and developer has a meaning in this context. Since maybe 20-30 years. And that meaning is writing code. If you do html, you are a web developer, if you write software, you are software developer, if your software is games, you are game developer. I would guess it started with some coders looking for a fancy word.
Do creators of board games and table top games call themselves game developers? I think they tend to go by game designers.At least wikipedia calls the inventors of such games designers. But board games are a lot older then the computer stuff. And that is the thing , in computer context lots of words are repurposed. Like mouse. Or developer.
What kinda was tried here, is to step back and reenter with descriptive meaning of the repurposed word, to include additional meaning. Just look at that citings of 18th century meaning of the word developer.
I could also try to rename developers as writers. They write code, do they not. So they are just like journalists, book authors and other writers ;-)
You're taking semantics far too seriously, the main point of the thread is not the semantics itself, as you noticed it's just a boy trying say a reviewer also takes participation on the development of a game (which, you guessed, is BS). Whether the term developer applies or not is just detail.
And yes your last example is a good example on how semantics can be deceiving, there's a job called "Tech Writer" in which is usually the one responsible for developing documentation and user experience related stuff, most of them also code.
This is what I said " I agree with the part that you seem to try to claim that everybody involved in the creation of the game deserves similar recognition."
If that was not clear enough, I was giving you a chance to make your point, but all you had was just offensive trash talk, you failed.
I could go edit that to make it clear what I think about you now kid.
I'm done with you, you need to learn how to respect and talk like an adult before talking to me or anyone, I'm not even going to read your answer anymore.
