Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(+4)(-10)

SPOILTERS:

I played for hours and hours, but eventually all of the obvious progressive politics and your main character's lack of ethics or even the option to be ethical became annoying.
Here are some examples:
She steals from someone while also courting him and being legitimately interested in him, then loots his corpse because for some reason she can't stop thinking about paying for rent, lol! It would be funny if the game felt like it was trying to be a farce. Instead it plays like an unintentional tragedy.

Moreover, she's supposed to be "innocent," or at least that's how she's portrayed when you play a "pacifist" route (no sex, flashing, et cetera) but no matter how clean you act, the idea of "virtue" is so meaningless to the writers that they don't really know how to make her consistent with her own beliefs: in that regard, she acts like a slut, flirts with people to the point of basically lying to them, and performs every physically uncouth sexual act possible short of actual sex acts, but then murmurs under her breath about how anyone who doesn't fall for her seduction is a prick, so you end up playing as an open hypocrite.
At one point you can tell a character to not touch you, and you get the specific option to tell him either 1) I like it, 2) I don't like it, and 3) I would like it if it were anyone but you, Perv.
So I select option 2, which is a very standard moralizing point that progressives, particularly the feminist branch, love to trot out: "Don't touch me without permission," and fair game, you shouldn't touch someone without their permission, perfectly reasonable.
But then a few moments later an attractive guy touches her int he exact same way and she giggles with delight. If I were playing a character that was MEANT to be an annoying skank this would be fine, but that is obviously not the kind of character she's supposed to be, so it just comes off as a betrayal, especially since five seconds prior it had given me the option to go to bat for the guy, which I did because the story forced her to accept him along with her (because she was too cowardly to say no) and I figured, hey, if we agreed to accept him into the party then we're going to treat him fairly within that context.

I know, I know, it sounds like I'm complaining about lefty politics in a game about banging horse-cocks, but it's not about the politics, it's about inconsistent characterization, it's about likable characters and it's about obvious politics being put into the game in a way that don't even make sense.
One last example is that Donald Trump is in the game, which could be funny, and in fact is: He says all of his "I'm the best" lines and it's great, but then they have the main girl say that the guy is "giving her the creeps" after a bit of hum-drum dialogue that's not nearly as bad as tons of other stuff she has had any obvious problems with. 
I would not be surprised if he makes some kind of claim to enjoy raping women and it not being a joke because someone don't understand male banter and thinks sex jokes are declarations of intent.

There's just too much of this gobbledygook pulling me out of the game and eventually I just couldn't handle it. I think it was mostly the lead character's inconsistent personality though. It'd be one thing if she started as a slut, or if there were some kind of unavoidable slut-transformation that happened at some point. Instead, she is the ultimate hypocrite, keeping her veneer of cutesy virginity and kind innocence while acting openly not just like a slut, but a cunt, constantly muttering insults beneath her breath. In other words, I grew to dislike her because, for some reason, the writers decided that her inner thoughts should be constantly disdainful of anyone around her that wasn't obsequious.

Again, to be clear, a slut in a game is fine, and in this kind of game you expect sluts, it all works, but they managed to create just the right combination of the WORST of female traits, specifically if you're doing a non-whore run. I think it works a bit better if she lets herself be pile-drived by anything with three legs, but there's still the other niggles even in that scenario.

Anyway, I gave my $1 and I respect the work put into it.

(3 edits) (+6)(-3)

Oh dear, an incel angry that a female that acts as 99% of males in sex and 'h' or ecchi games/animes (fucks various others and isn't 100% devoted to one partner) is shown in a sympathetic light. THE HORROR! THE OUTRAGE! Go rub that mini stub to rape and harem shit like we all know you do, 'hypocrite'.

Your butthurt over how your 'alpha hero' totally-not-a-real-rapist Trump gets dragged is delicious and hilarious. I'm especially heartened to hear you found it 'not funny' because your definition of 'joke' could probably use some work (like, not bragging about actually abusing married women and calling people slurs and taunting his actual court-proven rape victims).

(+1)(-8)

"Shown in a sympathetic light."
There is occasion in which she's shown sympathetically, and I have no problem with that, nor is it related to any of my complaints.

"Incel."
Try again. XD

"Hypocrite'."
I don't think this addresses anything I said about the game.

"Your butthurt over how your 'alpha hero' totally-not-a-real-rapist Trump gets dragged is delicious and hilarious."

You don't know me, which is obvious because this is all just baseless nonsense.

"I'm especially heartened to hear you found it 'not funny' because your definition of 'joke' could probably use some work (like, not bragging about actually abusing married women and calling people slurs and taunting his actual court-proven rape victims)."


It's interesting that you seemed to have read my post, because otherwise you couldn't make this comment at all, but somehow you misread it so that you think I said "not" funny when in fact I said it was funny. My issue was with the obvious partisanship, whereby they have Trump say something fairly innocuous, but then have people react to him as if he just said something horrid, all so they can make the "joke" that "orange man bad." 
There is PLENTY to make fun of Trump for, and the game even does it: It repeatedly mocks his arrogance. That's fun, that's based in reality, that makes sense. But for anyone who actually read up on the trial where the woman accused him of rape, any suggestions that he is "creepy" or a rapist are patently idiotic and obvious come from a place of someone who has inserted him in the game not really to be funny as much as to mock political opposition. As a point of comparison, I would never put a Joe Biden figure in any of my novels, despite considering him an awful president.

If you do respond again, and that response is just more angry bashing, then congratulations, you may have the last word.

(+4)(-3)

I love how much time you spent on this reply, incel hypocrite sad little boy with stub dick whining about a female protag fucking multiple people and not being tied to any one person. Please reply again to underscore how much of a butthurt crybaby you are. 

(+3)(-1)

Imagine being rightwing psycho creep offended by a meme 🫣

Bro... It's a HENTAI GAME... what were you expecting? The purpose of this is solely to get your rocks off. Anything else is bonus.