I like how you're trying to do all this shit and bolster your image with your army of alts and sycophants.
1) "Was anyone talking to you?"
You're clearly illiterate. And clearly, since you seem so fond of cherry picking your shit ass replies, let me recap what other fellow members of 2S have expressed, and that Since you shit ass bitches clearly couldn't find shit to do and decided to pick on a 2S member, other 2S members came to defend.
This has been worded for a 2-year old and if any of your future, no doubt, falsely, stereotypical propaganda replies further address this point and directly contradict it as thus, just note it as invalid.
2) "Also, if 2s is decent, how did i smoke that 2s player in a 2v1 in the post i made. "
Wow. A clan doesn't need to be 100% super sweaty pros, as you guys have apparently stereotyped the clan as, to be a decent clan. What defines a clan is that people stick for each other in a more kin way in which other clans keep their members through a reward-punishment system. It doesn't matter if you pick the least skilled member and smoke them, challenge kuro instead. There are always better people.
Also to note, when did we say that 2S was only pros? What point of ours is this point meant to prove?
3) " Next, 2s people didn’t just defend their friends. I get that, cuz i defend bowboi. 2s players also came in to be mean to everyone else, which was not needed."
It's funny how you say this, as this current reply was undoubtedly a futile attempt at ad hominem fallacy.
Does it not apply that the current state, where you defend your friend by being "mean?" I would say the stuff we'd say, at most match, or aren't like this bullshit you're trying to cook.
In fact, we have a valid point to defend in this case, that is, where you were making slander about how a member is a spammer and noob, and much more.
What point are you defending? That bowboi should continue to use racist slurs, discriminate against 2s, etc?
Fuck you your arguments are literally circular.
4) "Bowboi is my friend, and I get what he’s saying. It’s hard to play with low fps, and you could AT LEAST show him a bit of sympathy."
Did we, at least originally, give a fuck about boohooboi's fps and shit computer? No.
It was his own salt that drove his own incentive, where after he was smoked, he started calling us noobs because of his own fps issue. Where in this itself is a defendable point?
Whereas we originally could have shown sympathy, (which is impossible to say, we can't sympathize with an inapplicable situation, rather we can only empathize), now it was its act in itself that enforces the impression and his cult of personality by your reply.
5) "U should leave, i think, cuz you’re being a jerk for no reason 👍 "
You're clearly experienced at delivering half-truths. (I can find many).
" for no reason 👍" is a point you seemed to be fond of, just as a slight addition each time, but each time, you haven't seemed to have attempted to find a reason dancing naked in front of your eyes. But I guess that was an effect of your illiteracy. If you want an answer, give a valid question.
Think over: is the shit you're trying to say valid in the first place? Are half-truths reliable in telling full-truths? Don't just attack with your attempted fallacies. Maybe clear up and try to attack a point, rather than the previous speaker itself. You should realize (undoubtedly, I shall not blame you due to your distinct abnormalities) that if you find yourself ever using ad hominem, that you don't have a point to argue.
Also try to argue defendable points (?) because half the time I don't even know what you're trying to attack.
