Deleted 117 days ago
I don't so much have a problem that there WAS suicide in the game but more in how awfully it was written (a cheap plot twist so she could guilt her fans into reverse-review bombing her game.) If she couldn't write about such a sensitive topic respectfully and with some actual tact, it should never have been included.
I mean, obviously she can write whatever she wants, but she shouldn't be shocked when people, particularly those who have been actually impacted by suicide in some way, criticize her for it.
Edit: Also, from what I understand, the content warnings were only added to the game AFTER people complained.
First, this is a "play in browser" game that DID NOT feature content warnings during it's original release, meaning if you played this *IN* browser you'd be not given a warning prior to playing which is creator negligence. Her twitter response just added fuel to the fire, it connects some dots but overall it still doesn't make sense. As well as people should be allow to criticize things, if you post stuff on the internet (or much less make a game and beg your viewers/player/fanbase/etc to rate it 5.0 to get a "good ending.") people are going to say something about that. Did I mention overall the lack of care towards sensitive subjects?
The content warnings were not added until just a few days ago.I played the game when it was first released and again yesterday to see what's changed. It did not have that pop up box in game when i first played.
Those warnings should have been in the game from the start.I don't blame people for being shocked.