Just wanted to share another perspective. The writing is so cohesive everywhere else that I think the majority of players will understand that those are stylistic choices and not machine translation errors. The little idiosyncratic bits actually greatly enhanced my enjoyment of my time with the game so far (and I have a bit of a theory that they may also be subtle examples of ludonarrative harmony, but even if I'm wrong, my earlier point still stands). I can't speak on whether such authorial flourishes that make this work stay with me more than if they had been written in a less unique manner are perhaps objectively the wrong writing choice, as I assume some writers would claim-all who choose to write are a very opinionated bunch by necessity, obviously- but I for one am very glad they're there and would mourn them if they're ever to be completely removed.
Anyways, thank you so much for what is clearly a great deal of hard work on this. I'm eager to see what fresh trauma you've in store for your players in future updates!