After reading this 4 times, I just realized something new. I was mixing beauty with art. For something to be beautiful it doesn’t have to be art. Good example with nature. I need to rethink my stand on art. Although the topic was AI Art.
Drioko Weizz
Creator of
Recent community posts
I understand you but I don’t think AI is replacing human art, if anything it is enhancing it! And as you said AI was created by humans and the art it creates is not a single human’s art but the collective artistic hive like human mind that creates it. Not the art of 1 human but the art of humanity. That’s what is amazing about AI art to me, and I believe it is art. To me at least. The concept of art is relative. To me anything that exists through a human perspective can be art. Just like the colours of galaxies, stars, quantum physics, animals, etc. Nothing cancels anything. Art can be A, but it doesn’t mean it can’t also be B, or C, or &, or *648H, etc. I hope that makes sense.
Wow. That is the dumbest thing I have read in a long time. AI just like cameras, programming languages, digital art softwares, are all merely advanced science that allows us to create cool art. I’m not gonna write more than this. It is so dumb to hate on AI anything when it’s