Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

Clarification Needed on Crisis Icon Interaction with "30019"

A topic by irefrixs created 11 days ago Views: 45 Replies: 2
Viewing posts 1 to 2
Developer

Hi everyone,

I have a question about the Crisis Icon mechanic.

The Crisis Icon reads:

While at least one crisis icon is in play, threat cannot be removed from the main scheme by any player.

Let’s say “01108” (which has a Crisis Icon) is in play, and we play “30019” and attach it to “01108”. If we then use our hero’s basic THW to remove the last threat on “01108,” we reach a point where we can trigger “30019”’s effect.

image.png

“30019” reads:

Discard this card -> remove an equal amount of threat from a different scheme.

However, the threat on the main scheme cannot be removed by “30019”’s effect because, when we trigger “30019,” “01108” is still in play, and the Crisis Icon on it is still active, blocking threat removal from the main scheme.

We are unsure if this processing is correct, as we can’t find any rules or FAQs that address this situation. If anyone has insights or can point us to relevant rules or FAQs, we would greatly appreciate it!

Since 30019 is an interrupt and not a response, I tend to lean towards how you described above; being unable to thwart on the main scheme because the crisis icon is still out.

Found this reddit thread from 3 years ago that supports this: https://www.reddit.com/r/marvelchampionslcg/comments/wdyvb2/crisis_side_scheme_o...

Developer (1 edit)

Hi @Masn1999,

Thank you for your reply! I appreciate your insights on this matter.

We have updated the ability type of “30019” to a Response and tested it in the same situation, but we found that the threats on the main scheme could still not be removed.

Upon checking, we discovered that the event “When any amount of threat is removed from the attached scheme” triggers before “After the attached scheme is defeated.” And the attached scheme only leaves play during the latter event.

We also updated the timing to “When the attached scheme is defeated” and retested the card, but we still could not remove threats, as the attached scheme remains in play until the event “After the attached scheme is defeated” occurs.

Based on these findings, I believe we should maintain the original logic: “30019” cannot remove threats when it is attached to a crisis side scheme.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your thoughts.