This is a really interesting, technically impressive entry, and we'd be very interested to see you use this yourselves in a game/gallery environment.
Feedback
- When we set it up, and played around with the showcase, our performance was not great for all of us. We expected it to be better than Crayta's physics to replace them but fell short in some performance areas.
- Is quite a technically impressive package and not sure many people would have the skills to be able to use it. It's awesome and great work - but for build jams we're looking for useability and functionality for other players. Technical but accessible.
- Was a little confused by some areas of the showcase and what it was showing us - this didn't lose your marks, but with such a complicated package it would've been good to be clearer at showing just how impressive it can be.
SO in all, it scored really high for technical ability and creativity, but lost in its areas of performance, and useability. Hope this helps?
That does make sense. I can understand that perspective on it being too complex. I did put on the forum about the performance (it is running server side) but we didn't experience that hit during testing. All helpful stuff though. Thanks!
Comments
This is a really interesting, technically impressive entry, and we'd be very interested to see you use this yourselves in a game/gallery environment.
Feedback
- When we set it up, and played around with the showcase, our performance was not great for all of us. We expected it to be better than Crayta's physics to replace them but fell short in some performance areas.
- Is quite a technically impressive package and not sure many people would have the skills to be able to use it. It's awesome and great work - but for build jams we're looking for useability and functionality for other players. Technical but accessible.
- Was a little confused by some areas of the showcase and what it was showing us - this didn't lose your marks, but with such a complicated package it would've been good to be clearer at showing just how impressive it can be.
SO in all, it scored really high for technical ability and creativity, but lost in its areas of performance, and useability. Hope this helps?
That does make sense. I can understand that perspective on it being too complex. I did put on the forum about the performance (it is running server side) but we didn't experience that hit during testing. All helpful stuff though. Thanks!