I'm happy you implement more diversity.
But since I don't really like "Fannies"/"snatches"/pussies etc., can I avoid this content, too? - This way the enjoyment/immersion isn't messing with my arousal states while playing. Those who love it, too, certainly won't mind, but I love cock too much and get immediately turned-off by vags.
I mean, I didn't even wanna come out through my Mom's I was told and was beet-red when I finally dared to "brave the Canal" ;-P ...so, maybe I'm unconsciously traumatized by that, I dunno.
But one - unavoidable during natural birth (and not c-section) - encounter with that was quite enough for me, thank you very much.
I still love that you implemented it for everyone else who also loves it or doesn't mind as much that they're also turned-off by it. That's why I'm all in for the representation and possibility, but personally for me, I can be in a non-sexually intimate friendship then with pussy-guys, but anything else just doesn't "trigger my fancies".
A pulsating and throbbing cock inside me or feeling the powerful cum-shots or slowly warming cum-dribbles filling me up, is just too intense of a closeness and bonding-process, that I have cum to love, that I'd wanna live without it anymore in an erotic/sexually intimate partnership (Demi-gay)...for me sharing the cum is sort of the most intimate and trust-proving "gift" to each other, that there is...why its betrayal is also kinda bad (unless it's a consensual poly-relationship, then the more the merrier, of course - which can also help balance varying - also over time through mood, circumstances or otherwise [temporarily or permanently] altered - libidos from everyone involved).
So, yeah love the possibility but prefer it to be optional (optin-in or -out doesn't matter there, i.m.h.o. though)