Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
Tags
(2 edits) (+1)

This was very funny and technically impressive as always. Lowed the 'Low Quality Portraits' if you chose that version. Kinda wish the tilesets were like that too.

I think the two endings missed the mark though. The Bad Ending is like: "Sure, you've saved the world, but you also did this one bad thing the game allowed you to do, so now you are IRREDEEMABLY EVIL!" Might just be my frame of reference, but the vast majority of games I know of with "moral choices" weren't like that. They tended to be more like: "Sure, you've spent the whole game acting like the biggest douchebag in existence, but as long as you defeat the bad guy and choose the good ending, no one will care and everyone will praise you as the greatest hero in the world", which I think would've been a better thing to parody, as part of the humour in this game seems to be based around the fact that ultimately, Harold's choices don't matter.

Endings based entirely on an arbitrary "morality meter" seem to be pretty rare in comparion.

(2 edits)

I come from a culture that doesn't necessarily value free will and instead the value of 'duty' tends to be more familiar with me. My intent was to portray what I think how the world would work if life was really about choices. So, I added choices in situations that don't make sense and part of my idea was to exaggerate the supposed impact of these choices. It's also why the gimmick was packaged in a glitchy aesthetic, because IMO it's ultimately not how the world works and it's what 'free will' sounds like to someone who sees that people's choices are ultimately limited by their material conditions, if that make sense.

I could be more focused with the theme but overall this was an in-the-moment shitpost I made since I didn't have the availability to make a sincere, full-effort entry like I did in past jams.

(+2)

Tbh, I confess that I don't really understand that worldview. Sure, real life imposes boundaries and limits your choices depending on your situation, but I don't see how it invalidates 'free will' to act how you wish so. You might not 'archieve' what you want and it might actually be impossible to archieve it in the first place, but you can still 'decide to' attempt it regardless. I guess you simply have a different definition of 'free will' than I do.

But back to the game. My best guess is that you were meaning to parody the mindset of: "You can archieve anything and be anyone if you just set your mind to it! Pull yourself up by your bootstraps!", which if that was your intention, then the game really doesn't come off that way. Things like "choosing not to take damage from lava" are a promising start, but on their own they just come off as random absurdist humour rather than some commentary on the nature of free will.

IMO, it would've been better focusing the whole game on choices Harold makes and gradually taking it to an absurd conclusion.

Like, have Harold walk into a restaurant, with a choice being whether he orders pancakes or waffles and then somehow have all the other characters gather around and treat it as some super epic choice that will determine the fate of the whole world, pleading with Harold to choose one or the other. Or have Harold be given the choice to donate some money to charity and if he does so, suddenly the game says that Harold singlehandedly solved poverty and the whole town is happy and all their problems disappear. While if he keeps the money to himself, the whole town starves to death immediately and becomes a ghost town.

Or when Harold has the choice to look for a job, have there be a list of occupations that include something ridiculous like King, Famous Actor, Billionaire or a Superhero and whatever Harold chooses, he instantly becomes just that.

Then you could escalate to the more absurdist choices, like choosing not to die, choosing not to take damage, choosing what time of day it is and in the end choosing what ending you want and they are all equally shallow.

I think that would've better reflected what seems to have been your intention? Right now, the game is funny, but your intention doesn't seem to have been translated properly into it. But as you say, this was a spur-of-the-moment entry, so that's understandable.