Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

I didn't really notice the stars because I didn't see any indicator of what gives you the stars or how fast exactly you have to be? (I actually thought they were pickups I was missing) Because speed is the only reason to match the shape, if the player isn't interested in stars, the acceleration loss actually becomes a good thing (I've slipped off a ledge to my death many times due to going too fast).

I'd say the scaling might need a purpose other than speeding through the right hole, like if scaling in a direction also scaled your speed in said direction (so y scaling gives more jump height, forward scaling makes you faster forwards, etc.). 

I think having to get to a certain location to revert your scaling had some puzzling potential, i.e. you have to get to location A before you can resize yourself and fit into location B rather than a linear route. Though, this wouldn't work in this specific game because having time pressure and puzzling don't mix.

A more brute-force method would be to give the stars a purpose, like an alternate ending if you manage to get a certain amount. It's elegant and easy to implement, but it also forces players to prioritize speed, and time pressure can be rather stressful.

I think the best solution really depends on what you think is most important about the game. Is it about beating the clock and executing moves with the perfect timing? Is it about using the mechanics given to you and the map's features to methodically solve each level?  Is it about coming up with new and novel ways to use a mechanic already given to you? As long as it feels rewarding to engage with, I'd say it works.

The times to get the stars are only present at the end of each level (in the tab that is opened when collecting the microchip) but it would be more correct to include them in the selection menu as well. 

I agree that the purpose of the stars is indeed ephemeral, a player can decide to strive to get them all or ignore them not interested in the challenge. Giving a reward for achieving a number of stars (such as unlocking levels, dialogue, endings, cosmetics, or in-game currency) is certainly a clever way to entertain players who are not solely interested in the challenge. 

The puzzle approach I usually rule out since these gamejams are always saturated with such games, but the idea of providing a speed boost based on the scaled-down axis is something that would definitely have interesting applications.

The idea I started from here was actually was to create a very basic version of Neon White, then make the speed of level completion a priority challenge.

One design (or rather geometric and engine) problem I had was that resizing on the z-axis could virtually negate the need to have to choose other types of resizing. I solved it by reducing the speed when the hole was mismatched and limiting the ability to resize on that axis by level. Initially, though, I had solved it by making that transformation a little bit thicker in the x and y axes so that it still didn't go through the other holes, but capturing the velocity caused Unity to make the colliders interpenetrate anyway. If this solution had worked, the levels would definitely have been geared toward a more puzzle approach.