Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(1 edit) (+1)

I was loving this game on a first playthrough and I really thought I was doing things well. However, for some reason I found Asterion really hates MC and fears him, this confuses me a lot, since I strongly believe I have good enough reason to have made good enough choices. 

Spoiler warning ahead!

I'm currently at a point in the story where I am locked in a ruthless route and... It's nothing like what I was having before it. My MC only ever sent Asterion out when Argos promised not to do harm, but I wasn't that inclined to say I was naive because of it. In fact: it makes sense, to my mind, that I should send Asterion out believing Argos wouldn't touch him, and it wasn't all for nothing since it got us the mirror. 

After the previous point, I believe I wasn't given enough chances to explain or fix my actions, only one dialogue choice (The one when I'm confronted with Argos the day after). Besides, I believed it would have been a good enough apology to look for Asterion's wine without ever sending him to the valley again.

Now I find that Asterion fears me and everyone hates me after the concert, which really felt puzzling. Then there was the ruthless master description, which depicted MC as someone obsessed with sending Asterion out for the artifacts (which, mind you, I haven't got any + I never sent Asterion out after what Argos did). This is the one point that really disconnected me from the story.

I'm currently at a point where MC depicts a character who I simply disagree with completely. Maybe my dialogue choices were taken to the extreme? But if that's the case, I feel like I didn't have much agency to explain myself better throughout the story, then.

However I feel right now, and although I feel like the dialogues were too harshly extreme, I still love the story and look forward to reading more!

(+1)

Heyya. If you read some posts by Minoh (especially the older ones) he gives some examples of logical reactions.

Taking that context, we are a powerful person who can do whatever we want to Asterion. He fears us and is very suspicious, to the point of even doubting any good intentions. For example, instead of helping him, let them take care of himself. Later on we will learn that all masters, even the kinder ones, have been strict. He thinks it improper for a master, even a kind one, to show too much sympathy.

Do not send Asterion out if you want to have good relations with him.


While Minoh takes care to think about the logical consequences of your choices, and I happen to agree that they are coherent, if you dig deeper down to your shadow, this is a very disturbing VN.

I'm a zoomer and don't particularly like this boomer version of gay portrayal. Just banging people because they happen to be gay rather than getting to know them first. Too freaking promiscuous.

And despite it all, we are still in a position of power over Asterion. I get the disgusting taste of white savior complex.


I think the story started out great. We don't get to learn more about the MC and why he remains in the labyrinth instead of going out sometimes. Surely he has a life and needs to let someone know he isn't a missing person case right?

A lot in this VN can be cut out and have no negative impact for the reader. MC and Asterion were discarded to explore new characters, but we explore them way more than MC or even the Minotaur in "Minotaur Hotel". The guests were great, but not the new character you choose or the peacock. They get a longer story than the gryphon or dragon... Sadly I see it as the mark of a bad writer if they're writing things that have no impact on the themes or story. We could easily keep them separate and both would be good stand alone, but these extra characters being heavily invested in ruins 'Minotaur' Hotel in my opinion.