Here's another conflict
Last I checked 29 is almost 30 (3 decades old) not 40 (4 decades old)
25 days ago (+4)(-1)
Yeah ... you start decade 4 on your 30th birthday. This reference is dead on. Your analysis is ... poor at best.
17 days ago(-1)
A decade is literally 10 years... So unless 29 now equals 40 then it is 3 not 4 decades
3 days ago(-1)
So let me get this straight, Copilot (Microsoft AI), Gemini (Google AI), and Meta (Facebook AI) all got the answer wrong? Like I said unless 29= 40 it is NOT almost 4 decades IT IS ALMOST 3 decades.
18 hours ago (+1)
The keyword here is "nearly in", that is to say nearly starting her fourth decade. Once you reach 30, you have 'finished' living for 3 decades and you start your fourth. It's kinda like how we are in the 21st century even though the 2000s, relatively speaking, just started and it is no where near the year 2100 yet. Semantics, i know, but thats just how english works sometimes
Edit: also, its troubling that people are starting to rely on ai for trivial matters like this. It's like giving up on thinking all together and asking someone to just hand you the answer
Besides, GenAI is in and of itself not infallible and there is always a non zero chance that it they generate a wrong answer
if you have ever seen ai generated images/artworks you know what i mean