Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

I did not choose "Interpolation 4x";.. I chose "Interpolation 2x", going from 25fps to 50fps. Section size on mine was 200, padding was 80. I can probably increase those, but I get "Out of Memory" in Split-frames mode if I leave the defaults to 500/200, even with a 6gb card.

I noticed you're going from 23.976 (24fps) fps to 95.. then telling DAIN to go back down to 60?? Why? You should probably just go for "Interpolation 2x" to get 47.952‬ (48fps), or even manually set the final frame rate to 59/94 (60fps).

I am guessing the 4x interpolation (instead of 2x) and forcing DAIN to convert from 95fps to 60fps is why yours is taking so long.

I wonder if we had CUDA version 9 (that they used to test) and a Pascal (not Turing) based graphics card, if it would work faster. I also wonder about virtual memory, input resolutions, different imported codecs supported, etc. There's too many variables.

Well, because I make MAD video and I hope the video can 60 fps. I learn the way from  a website video uploader and his 2080 Ti works well. Or MAYBE I should interpolation 2x and select 'create 60 fps verion of movie' ? However , TONIGHT I well try to use your way and wish me render faster. LOLS

I have a 2080 Super, and I get a frame roughly every 10 seconds. The stitching in the end takes way longer however. I got a 3 second clip in roughly 2 hours, the frames were already done after like 10 minutes tho.