I'm very intrigued by the concept. It takes the PbtA philosophy to a completly different place, and I like it there! A really cool game.
I was wondering though: there is an example in the text, of a character without any violent actions in his Kits who ends up having to face violence, and I asked myself what that would look like. How does that player/character engage with the situation (or with any other high stakes circumstance that they don't have a corresponding action for)?
This is honestly one of my favourite potential questions a group will have to tackle. Obviously the actions the player does have at their disposal will greatly affect what nonviolent response they want to take. Skulking away, making a pact with a supernatural being or even trying to ingest something are all gonna produce distinct and weird moments.
I do think it's probably important to let players know if a GM plans to throw a lot of potential combat at them when they are making characters so they can choose their tools correctly.
