itch.io

Below is a single, consolidated reply that addresses both the board meeting Video and the “Tumultuous Tale of Jasonafex” video you referenced. It explains why neither piece of evidence supports the “fake grape” narrative or other severe claims you’ve made.

1. The Board Meeting Video

A. Focus on Internal Policy, Not Criminal Allegations

• The board meeting Video primarily discusses moderation decisions, financial procedures, and internal governance—not proof of fabricated assault claims.
• The conversation revolves around how and why certain individuals were removed from a Discord server and whether convention funds were used appropriately. These are internal policy matters, not legal determinations of guilt or innocence for any alleged crime.

B. Wife’s Responsibility vs. Jason and Kate

• Within that Video, Fox (the speaker) blames Jason and Kate for engaging in explicit behavior near his daughter. However, it also becomes clear that the wife was the homeowner (or co-resident in charge) and had primary responsibility to manage her household.
• Even if guests behave inappropriately, legal or moral responsibility typically falls on the person who controls the environment—especially if a minor is involved. No official legal action was taken against Jason or Kate regarding these claims, further undermining the idea that the board meeting proves they committed any crime.

C. No Admission of “Fake Grape”

• The video does not show Jason or Kate admitting they fabricated any assault. Instead, it shows Fox accusing them of endangering his daughter, and them being removed from events as an “emergency moderation measure.”
• There is no point where anyone says, “We lied about assault,” or, “We made it up.” Without such an admission or a verified legal ruling, you cannot conclude the assault claims were “fake.”

2. The “Tumultuous Tale of Jasonafex” Video

A. No “Fake Grape” Evidence at 16:58

• You repeatedly reference the timestamp 16:58, but at that moment, the video simply shows Kabier’s tweets from December 2017, where she mentions feeling unsafe and stepping away from social media.
• Nothing in that segment provides concrete evidence of a fabricated assault claim. The tweets only confirm some conflict occurred; they do not establish any “fake grape” confession.

B. The Screenshot at 17:02

• At 17:02, the screenshot is Kabier’s Twitter post, saying she’s taking a break due to “events that unfolded.”
• Again, this does not prove Jason or Kabier lied about assault. It’s simply Kabier indicating distress and asking for time off social media.

C. Overall Content Is Commentary, Not Legal Proof

• Lanza’s video covers a wide range of internet drama and controversies surrounding Jasonafex—underpayment of workers, grooming allegations, disputes with roommates, etc.
• Despite citing screenshots, audio clips, and KiwiFarms threads, the video does not provide independently verified documentation (like police reports or court findings) that any alleged assault was fabricated.

D. Leaked Audio =/= Admission of Faking Assault

• Around the 25–30 minute mark, the video discusses an audio leak of Kabier and Jason threatening a roommate (Bleakly) with assault charges if he didn’t comply with their demands.
• While the clip does show toxic, manipulative behavior—threatening to file a report is not the same as admitting you invented a crime. There is no statement like, “We made it all up.”

E. No Official Verification or Legal Conclusion

• If Jason and Kabier truly fabricated assault, you’d expect a legal investigation or court ruling concluding they lied. The video shows no such documentation.
• KiwiFarms, while known for aggregating information, is not a legal authority. User posts, screenshots, and out-of-context audio can be compelling, but they are not conclusive proof without independent verification.

3. Other Extreme Cases (Kero the Wolf, Hypnotist Sapphos, etc.)

• You cite other furries (Kero the Wolf, Hypnotist Sapphos) who faced disturbing allegations (bestiality, grooming).
• These separate controversies do not strengthen your “fake grape” claim against Jason and Kabier. Each case must be judged on its own evidence; referencing unrelated individuals does not automatically prove Jason and Kabier lied about assault.

4. Key Takeaways

1. Board Meeting Video

   • Focuses on internal con policies and removing guests, not proving any assault was “faked.”
   • The homeowner (Fox’s wife) bears primary responsibility for what occurred in her house, and no legal action was pursued against Jason or Kate.

2. Lanza’s YouTube Video

   • Primarily commentary on drama and controversies.
   • No verified documentation (police reports, court findings) proving Jason/Kabier fabricated a crime.
   • No admission from Jason/Kabier saying, “We lied about assault.”

3. No Official Evidence of “Fake Grape”

   • Threats to file charges do not equal a confession of lying.
   • Tweets/screenshots at 16:58 and 17:02 show Kabier’s emotional state, not a hoax admission.
   • KiwiFarms threads and user-driven compilations are not legal proof.

4. Overall Conclusion

   • While these sources illustrate manipulative behavior, online disputes, and questionable ethics, they do not prove any sexual assault was fabricated.
   • Unless you produce official documents or a direct, verified confession from Jason/Kabier stating they faked the assault, your claim remains unsubstantiated.

In short, neither the board meeting video nor the “Tumultuous Tale of Jasonafex” video confirms any “fake grape” admission or establishes that Jason/Kabier invented assault allegations. They highlight interpersonal drama and possibly unethical conduct, but not conclusive evidence of a false assault claim.