I also believe that public voting should be unfair, at least the host must review the top games after public voting, and decide accordingly, putting everything at the hands of people will be very unfair and those who have multiple contacts and accounts will feel like a lottery and also as there are 138 entries many entries will not be rated and people can do unfair rating to promote their game. I don't think this is a good decision if sir cannot review all the games, at least review the top 20 or 30 games after public voting, and make decisions accordingly, please provide this message to Nikhil sir. Shortlisted disadvantages :-
1. People can do unfair voting to promote their games.
2. People can make multiple accounts and ask their friend to give 5 stars to promote their games.
3. Many entries will not be reviewed, maybe some of the games will be very good.
Hence, a game which deserves winning may not win and that hampers the spirit of game developers and the real moto of game jam will not be preserved.
Hence, please provide this message to Nikhil sir so that he can make decisions accordingly.