^ making all of this up
They are not making this all up. They have comments on my games. The reason why I moved on from BGE to CC6 (those are game engines) and I've started gaining more followers and people start noticing me is because they did wrote comments on my games. I don't agree with every thing they said, but constructive criticism is more important to me, personally, than positive feedback.
They have also contacted me on my email, which is on my page and yes, they helped me in some way to grow as a game developer.
I did not say my world view was 100% solid, that's your argument. And by saying what you meantioned I meant that it's the job of whoever raised you to teach things and not mine. Church comparison was hyperbolic, it serves the purpose to show that there are certain places, where certain topics are off limits and they shoulf stay that way. And don't call me ignorant please, you don't know me.
"what you are saying is that there is no subject off limits"
I think you're on to something...
"meaning 7 year old's can talk about pornography and NSFW?"
I've already expressed support for placing trigger warnings. If you take your logic to its extremes, then we should all avoid discussing certain topics in ANY context because a 7 year old might be secretly listening in. Absurd censorship logic.
Hey, just to bring things back into context and out of this fantasy land of hypotheticals, we're talking about a game that mentioned child abuse in the abstract in one line of its description, and NOWHERE in the actual game.
Yes, we should avoid talking about certain mature topics around children and in certain places. And finally, yes, we are talking about the game that meantioned "child abuse" with no purpose and no help to whomever, which makes it wrong to just put in the game at the first place. I am not against anybody, I am just concerned that this topic is innapropriate to be used in this context, that's it.