Quick question about Evidence that I might be missing. Say your game consists of exactly 4 players, each with a unique specialism.
If a player were to Gain Evidence in their own specialty, how could it be interpreted to be made a Clue? I assume you're not able to interpret it yourself, even though it's your specialism.
Could you get a "second opinion" on it from a "non-specialist" contact to interpret it or is it simply evidence that can't become a clue?
Really intriguing game; hoping to try it soon.
Investigators are able to interpret any Evidence that matches their specialism, even Evidence they find themselves. So if you investigate and turn up evidence that matches your own specialism, that's a lucky result: you get a free Clue!
Many thanks for your question; I will make sure to state this rule explicitly if I publish an update.
I hope you have fun with the game, and good luck!