Quick question about Evidence that I might be missing. Say your game consists of exactly 4 players, each with a unique specialism.
If a player were to Gain Evidence in their own specialty, how could it be interpreted to be made a Clue? I assume you're not able to interpret it yourself, even though it's your specialism.
Could you get a "second opinion" on it from a "non-specialist" contact to interpret it or is it simply evidence that can't become a clue?
Really intriguing game; hoping to try it soon.
shepric
1
Posts
A member registered Sep 18, 2020