Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
Deleted 2 years ago
(+5)(-2)

Thanks for letting me know about this issue. I did receive similar opinions on NewGround before and I replied with a long article. However, it's lost so I couldn't copy and paste it here. I don't want to retype it again so in simple words:

I hold a different point of view. I think this kind of work helps people with related sexual needs to relieve their eagerness to perform crimes in real life. To be honest, I am one of the lolicons you are talking about but I didn't intend to be one.  I don't know if I'm abnormal or not but I was born this way and couldn't change. 

I am 100%  against crimes/child porn involving reality. Not because of their appearance but the fact that they are not mature enough to determine whether sex is beneficial for them or not.

While my game is virtual fiction only and no real people are harmed. Sure, someone might commit a crime after reaching this. But I strongly believe they are likely to do so in the future even without contacting virtual materials, from the fact that some regions where things like my game are strongly prohibited still got a high rate of child-related crime.

I don't want to turn this even longer so I'd stop here. Of course, I didn't think it would be that easy to convince one with such simple words. But these are my opinion.  So thanks for the comment no matter what!

Deleted 2 years ago
(+1)

终究又落实到教育这个问题上了吗......

(+1)

我竟然看完了?!

good for u, to be honest I completely agree with that. Restrictions have their place but it can also make things worse if it becomes more repressive. Can't  wait for your next update with the little loli