Dead game
2 years ago(+8)
Was it ever really alive? it never exceeded more than 150 patrons and after Melissa's route it went on life support.
2 years ago(+5)
In all honesty, it had a slight glimmer to be a decent game, but the dev flat out murdered that.
Now it serves as a shining example of how not to make games. I eagerly await this thing to finally be posted up on and make it's grandiose debut to Steam so they can rip it to shreds. I actually may be waiting for that more than I am the game (and I'm not).
2 years ago(+1)(-4)
Well, even if it really is dead, it still has +/- 15 hours of perfectly good content.
Most abandoned projects get abandoned long before putting in that much effort.
Still, I'd prefer if it weren't dead so I'm just putting it on my long-term follow list. Along with the dozens of other interesting-but-on-Hiatus projects.
every once in a while, some old thing I nearly forgot about completely still releases an interesting update a decade later.
2 years ago(+1)(-4)
A little generous perhaps xD
I'm probably inclined to overcompensate for all the flak it's taking.
2 years ago(+3)(-1)
That's great. Two years is not long enough and perfectly good, so you can just stay signed up for the next decade waiting in non-stop anticipation for the rest of it.
This comment was so bad you literally caused me to scroll up and see if I was posting on itch.io again.
And I was.
2 years ago(+1)(-3)
And I lose what exactly by keeping it on an off-hand list I don't actively check more than once a year or so...?
But no worries, I don't honestly care about your opinions on what I do anyway.
2 years ago(-1)
You obviously do care as you are following me around all over this page like a lost puppy telling me all about the fake news you have signed up for.
I was actually thinking, before I opened up itch.io, how nice it would be to login and waste my time caring about all the pointless garbage you follow.
2 years ago(+1)
If you think a decade is perfectly good, then you have obviously taken the apologist bias stance toward this game.
2 years ago(-2)
Is putting something on a watch list I check once a year "perfectly good"?
well, up to your interpretation I guess.
Not like I'm standing around doing nothing but wait till then so I'd have long forgotten the game after a year if I didn't put it on that list. *shrugs*
2 years ago(+4)
Maybe this shithead of a dev should hand out free drugs. That way we be on the same cloud as that dumbshit that writes the monthly overview so then we can understand the spastic idiocy spewed every month like clockwork but never does anything with this fucking game.
2 years ago (+1)(-1)
A lack of updates does not 'ruin' the game - what exists does not change. It just means the people who wanted more are dissatisfied and start whining in the comments section. *shrugs*
If you want to say it ruins anything - it'd be the dev's chance to make money from his game since a good portion of his target audience will have started ignoring the game title if he really does release a big update later.
2 years ago(+1)(-1)
You obviously don't know what you are talking about. Try creating a game and letting it sit unattended for 12 months, and see if anyone is still jumping up and down over it. Then let it sit for 3 years, and see if you can actually build or keep any support after wrecking your reputation.
2 years ago(+1)(-1)
Again, that only hurts the dev's pockets - not anyone who finds the game and decides to play it.
2 years ago(-1)
Can't nobody find it if it's abandoned and forgotten about because it is not active. Nobody cares about abandoned games.
2 years ago(+1)
Fewer people care to check out abandoned games, not none at all.
I figure I can always attach whatever follow-up or ending I want using my own imagination if the story is worth the effort lol.
2 years ago(+1)
... Please don't ask pointless questions whose only aim is to paint things in the light you'd like to see them in.
2 years ago(-1)
Your words. Your thoughts. You are obviously being pimped out here on the board, so enjoy being a prostitute.