Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(+21)

I've been annoyed by the flood of Visual Novels and after months I've reached the point of wanting to rant.
As a good hearted internet person, I'd do the sensible thing and first search for it: "tag exclude" "tag exclusion search"... I've found ONE post, refering to another, refering to this 5 year old reply: https://itch.io/t/160014/can-i-use-exclusion-filters well that won't be enough. Another search for "search" and manually overlooking 20 posts... yeah no, nothing relating to my intend that I could add to. Obviously, I have to make my own post. Then I look for the right place to drop my rant instead of "General" and find this neat sticky thread. Yes, sticking it to top has just now prevented at least one additional rant thread. Reading through, I wanna say: If you mods feel bothered by the apparently weekly rants asking for that function, then tell me why was it so hard to find this? Why after 5 years we still need URL-editing to exclude one single tag instead of having a neat little button? Why feel you offended if anyone asks for multiple filters? You have a big fat library of great games so  EVERYONE can find SOMETHING . But NOTHING itself is right for EVERYONE. Some people like this, some people like that, and since you have a (great, I may add) sortiment of tag "adult" games, the obsession with thinning down to the good stuff is a very personal matter.

It's not about "Visual Novels are bad" or "Horror Games are gross" or "Too much letters in the rainbow, where is the straight stuff". It's about "today I want to find this one specific thing that I can't find when the results are flooded with this other general thing". It can be something easy like "Roguelike but no shooters please" or something complicated like "Action but no platformer, Rich Story but no Visual Novel, Laidback but no Sandbox"... Of course the function stands and falls with how the creators tag their works. But hey, anyone ever been to any booru site knows that stuff.

And please do make a button so the next one does not have to search for a 5 year old devpost to learn how to URL-edit for single tag exclusion.

(+4)

You only had to look around a little to find this topic. Also, you're mixing up mods and devs. Mods don't write code for the site and we don't know why this feature still hasn't been implemented after all this time. But it's been discussed many, many times in the forum. That's what a forum is good for: old discussions stick around and you can search for them. Yet all too often people prefer to ask again.

(+14)

That's exactly my point. I did use the tools meant to avoid throwing new threads over old topics - but they failed me.
Only manually looking lead me to this exact thread here, which I then chose to add my 50 cents to. So people can see this topic is still important, without me opening something new over something old.

I've choosen the word "mods" because this thread apparently opens with the discussion that the mods rather frown over the frequent complains and attempt to shut them down, and another user (I guess) suggested that sticking this thread could help - which in my case, it did. 

But yes, actually solving the problem apparently every week someone asks for - someone unaware of the dozens of times that exact question has been asked before - would be task for the devs, not the mods. My bad.