if you get kissed by someone, and you turn around and it's your wife, you didn't give consent at that moment but you grant consent after.
If you and your date have sex while high, because you are high, you cannot give consent. Afterwards, if you both are ok with it, you can grant uncoerced consent.
You cannot prosecute anyone if there is no victim. Consent can be given AND taken after the event.
Are you talking language or are you talking law?
Because language wise it is always momentarily for an action that happens or is or might be happening.
A synonym would be willing. You can't retroactivly be not willing for a thing in the past, were you do in fact were willing. Same as you cannot be willing later for a thing you were unwilling at the time.
It is not called changing your consent, there are other words for that. The first would be regret, the second approval. You can change your willingness during the act, though.
As for a wife kissing her husband, assuming a normal marriage, the wife would know the consentual status of the husband about kissing.
And while being high might impair your legal and attractivness judgment, if you screw while high and not while incapacitated, you were obviously willing and thus consenting.
You might regret it. That is even a common trope in story telling, drunkenly waking up next to a stranger. Or you might approve and go for round two in the morning.
But you cannot change your past consent. Unless you were roofied, you willingly got high with a potential sexual partner. One of the reasons to actually get high is to lower inhibitions. Imho it is a lame excuse to claim one could not give consent to whatever happens. If you get high willingly, you have to accept the consequences as your doing.
Now, legally, there might be differences, as legal terms have nothing to do with everyday language and are specific for a jurisdition and not universal. Language I can put into a translator, laws not so much.
Edit. @is that a bad thing blocked me after insulting me so I have posted my response further up the chain.
Lol.
You really are bad at this.
You couldn't even muster a justification for your actions or support for your position.
Then your attempts at an insult just amused me with its gross inaccuracy. Both factually and as an insult.
It is funny that he's doubling down on sharing his "problem" by once again using "not having sex" as an insult. And he further let us know his MRA affiliation by using the term incell. Which no one but bitter twisted MRAs (And yes I know bitter MRA is a redundant phrase.) use. Any bets on what not-having-sex-currently phrase he's going to use next? Eunuch? MRA? Asexual? His own name? Or do you think hes in the closet and the next round of insults will be homophobic smears?
It might be that he's going to let us know about a different fear of his by calling me a cuckold?
Or is he going to rage quit because I've already taken away all the insults he fears and he won't know what name to call me and he can't say anything that actually supports his position?
Sure, the fact that you are a virgin because you are someone who will never be chosen by anyone else is everyone else's problem, and you are just too perfect to be the common denominator... right? The real world has never worked that way, and it never will.
You being an incel? That is a uniquely a "you" problem. Not my fault in any world, you can stop blaming me for you being so unlovable that your own mother wishes she'd had an abortion.
Now, go play in traffic... and don't come back until your troll ass catches a car, ya worthless incel.
