Thanks!
As I know JSON-format (and as online JSON-validators can proof), this is valid behaviour; also test by Python 'json'-module, it can be correctly parsable.
I mean, that values, which you can type in app form, can be different types - not only integer numbers, for example.
But you right, there are big field to app impovement, and may be somewhen I upgrade it.
1 year ago(+2)
I think it is perfectly understandable to only support string types given the time constraints of the jam!
However, I feel it is a bit misleading to call the field (int/float/string/bool) when it only accepts strings. The behavior of compliant parsers will differ if they get a different data type (strongly typed languages might even refuse to parse into a struct that has the incorrect type!). For example JSON exported from your tool behaves strangely when parsed in my browser:
According to the JSON spec (https://www.crockford.com/mckeeman.html) there is a difference between a string containing an integer (‘”’ characters ‘”’ e.g. "123") and an integer (onenine digits e.g. 123).
I understand the confusion, as formal language grammar is complicated, and the many formats used don’t help at all. So I don’t think this is a serious deficiency in your tool, just maybe something to consider in the future 😉 I hope this did not come across as too negative, I rewrote this message several times to make it sound less unfriendly 😢. I just wanted to show that in JSON these things matter!
1 year ago(+1)
Thanks!
I do some additional test and understood, that you and Léon was right and plain types dont need to be 'strings' in result.
(...really, it can be - but only if after parse you convert fields by-hand, and this is terrible practice...)
Online validators fake me. =((
I update the tool when I can.
Sorry for unfunctional tool. =(
1 year ago(+1)
Don’t worry about it! 🙂
It is entirely understandable that you missed that part of the spec, especially considering the time constraints of the jam! Your tool is still really cool!
With the update to include other data types it will be even more useful!
1 year ago(+1)
Now tool correctly save type of boolean and number values and for work with js JSON.parse() method you can also click 'Export as string', with this option in JSON-file to data added `` (`...data...`)...so in values must not contain symbol '`'.
Thanks for advises.