itch.io

I can get behind that idea. I have supported a crowd-funded bara game project before, of which the dev didn't specify what is going to be in the game when the project was first announced. I backed the project for its art style / puzzle elements / etc and just assumed that the dev would be fair about the distribution of their nsfw content (in the sense that there will be a roughly equal amount of top and bottom content), but it didn't turn out that way. By the time I dropped that project, 8 out of 10 of the datable characters are exclusively for bottom players, which really pissed me off.

But, that's not exactly the case for this project. This project is rather new, and like the other guy in the thread pointed out, dev did mention this game is going to be different from OIHS. It's probably too early even for the dev to tell you how the story is going to play out. Worst case scenario, if the dev intend to make this project like OIHS and only feature content that is catered for sub bottoms, the project is free and public and you can still drop it. Although I agree if the dev can make it clearer, at some point, what type of content is going to be featured, it would be better, so you don't have to get too emotionally invested.

I also got the first impression that their comments came off somewhat passive aggressive, but I really don't think you viciously attacking them for being passive aggressive helped contributing to the constructive criticism you hoped the dev could get? 

I'm more of a completionist type of player, so I would play nearly everything a game has to offer, and I agree with what the other guy said below this thread, that there is a huge imbalance between top and bottom content in the bara / furry type of games. Other than games like OIHS that are entirely for only bottom players, top players usually get less options / content even in games that do feature player top content. I can't begin to count how many projects I have seen on this site falling into the category of "A story / an adventure of a small, weak human MC and his big dominant love interest(s)". So, I can understand why top players might be doubtful about TSP: A shiny new game with good-looking art? Click --> Wait it's from the dev whose last game was made entirely for sub bottom players? Wonderful. 

Again, I also don't appreciate the way they automatically assumed that the dev is going to do the same thing with this game and just jumped into conclusion (but as @Jorge San explained, he mentioned OIHS just to express that "if TSP is going to be a full player bottom game like OIHS, I'm going to avoid it", so he wishes to know right now how this game is going to turn out), but I guess you didn't really consider their perspective before you just outright started calling them "karening" "self-entitled" "whiny" and apparently "women"?? I don't know where you got pressed so hard by tops for you to need to be that hurtful, but it is in no way helping this project, and it's only doing the opposite. You'd do a better job telling them to maybe not stereotype this project by pointing it out to them, fairly, how they came off as aggressive and maybe they should try playing it first. Not sure even the dev himself would thank you for being this edgy a defender of his. Seriously, chill the f out.