This straight-up child p*rnography
306 days ago(+20)(-14)
YES?? Dude you should be put on a fucking watch list for this! Sexualizing minors is not and never will be okay!!!
306 days ago(+17)(-13)
DUDE THIS IS A REAL ISSUE! THE ONLY TWO OVER THE AGE OF CONSENT ARE LORI AND AND LENI, AND EVEN THEN IT SEEMS WRONG, NONE OF THEM ARE OVER THE AGE OF 18, SO THIS MEANS IT'S IL·LE·GAL DO I HAVE TO SPELL THAT OUT?
305 days ago(+15)(-17)
Dude if they exist or not! You're fucking sick for making this, and I don't care if that's what YOU coded her to say, she's like what, 8!? Dude she's. A. Minor! Can't you get that through your greasy, slimy, head!?
305 days ago(+5)(-6)
You and everyone who is okay with this are fucking sick and should be fucking beaten, this is not and never will be okay... Fucking sick bastard
305 days ago(+6)(-4)
Yes, I can code her to say that because she doesn't exist, so I can say she is 1 year old, or 80. Looney Tunes can hurt each other and don't die because, well, they are fictional. No one playing Call of Duty is a killer either just because they get a 5 person killing streak there.
Needless to say, please, learn the difference between fiction and reality before going to the internet, since only kids are impressionable enough to believe any of this is real, and you have to be 18+ to post here.
305 days ago(+9)(-7)
So in your defence... Because they say they are 18 from a fictional standpoint whilst they have the physical characteristics of a child, it is somehow ok? Canonically these characters are under the ages of 10 years old... So basically, you're using this game as an excuse to be a ped*phile?
305 days ago(+4)(-1)
My point is that since these characters don't exist, any author can do anything they want with it, from aging them up physically, or just on paper. Not to mention, I have yet to see a real child that looks like this. If these were realistic depictions of children, you'd have a point, but luckily, these are straight cartoons in every way.
301 days ago(+1)(-1)
in the real world you have a condition wich is called Highlander Syndrome and it stops you from aging. so lets just say all the caracters in the game suffer from it.
305 days ago(+2)(-10)
How can you fix this issue?
. Re-design ALL the characters in a new art style where they have the appearance and maintain characteristics of an ACTUAL 18-year-old.
&
. Separate the "brother-sister" relationships these characters have for the sake of the gameplay aspect
305 days ago(+5)(-3)
So you wnt me to remake all the characters in order for them to not resemble the original characters despite that being the main selling point of the game alongside the incest? Nah.
303 days ago (+7)(-1)
Why are you telling me to read something when you couldn't even read the very obvious disclaimer that clearly states that every character that is depicted sexually is 18? Why do you even care anyway, no actual children are in danger right? If you don't like seeing TLH porn then just ignore it instead of thinking, "Y'know what? I feel like causing problems just because I don't like this." Why not do something productive, like joining the police force since you want to protect "children" so badly?
302 days ago(+4)(-6)
"Why do you even care anyway, no actual children are in danger right?" Why are you using child endangerment as an excuse to watch child p*rnography, the fact you have little to no reassurance on the fact this game exploits the sexual orientation of canonically designed children is disgusting. So, from what you've just said, If someone labels a child as 18 years old and there is an opportunity for sexual interactions with this child, you're okay with that?
302 days ago (+4)(-2)
Jesus Christ, your skull is as thick as the mashed potatoes I had for thanksgiving. I never used "child endangerment" as an excuse to see CP, I used that as an example because quite literally nobody is getting hurt by this game. The characters in this game are fictional. If you don't know what that means, it means they aren't real. If a fictional character is stated to be 18 years old, they are 18 years old. You're also saying "If someone labels a child as 18 years old and there is an opportunity for sexual interactions with this child, you're okay with that?" as if I'd be sick enough to actually fuck a child. Once again, if you don't like The Loud House porn, then go away. Nobody forced you to be here, go on and do something productive instead of fighting in a losing battle.
302 days ago(+2)(-5)
You stated nothing to resolve with this comment...
In your words for the second time now, "If a fictional character is stated to be 18 years old, they are 18 years old" You must clearly be ok with CANONICALLY underage children having sexual interactions because this ped*phile of a developer did nothing more then say they were 18 rather than, changing the appearance of the characters so degenerate ped*philes like you can miserably m*sterbate to this collection of child p*rnography.
Whether something fictional or not is put under a label, just because the label transcribes a subject into something different, doesn't mean it fully identifies under the label. In short, you can not take a picture of a child (fictional or not), call it 18, and use it as marketable p*rnography just because you decided it to be 18 years old.
It is illegal and is registered under child p*rnography...
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW:
Child pornography under federal law is defined as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer-generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor.
And WAIT there's more...
SIMULATED PORNOGRAPHY:
Simulated child pornography was made illegal with the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA). The CPPA was short-lived. In 2002, the Supreme Court of the United States in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition held that the relevant portions of the CPPA were unconstitutional because they prevented lawful speech. Referring to Ferber, the court stated that "the CPPA prohibits speech that records no crime and creates no victims by its production. Virtual child pornography is 'intrinsically related' to the sexual abuse of children".
You've lost.
302 days ago(+5)(-2)
Pornography is protected under the First Amendment, mate, since it is considered a form of personal expression. Unless it depicts a real minor, it isn't illegal.
The only way it can be ruled illegal is under Miller's Obscenity Test, and that just goes case by case, and it only affects Supreme Court cases.
And all of that only applies to US. Luckily, the world isn't US.