Hi, can I ask what criteria was used to assign the grades in the first place? L)
I don't want to offend anyone, but this game. "Saga of Song, Ultraviolet". Best in "innovation" although the whole point of the game is to run on platforms and collect coins. Let's be honest, it's far from the best game in terms of innovation. The same goes for gameplay...
"Firebird DRM-Free version" Not sure why it's in 6th place on the chart either. And also ranks first in innovation, gameplay and music.
Road to Hollow Hills is a real soap, and yet it's #1 in graphics.... all gameplay is wandering through the woods with unbelievable lags. That said, the game is 5th in gameplay, and 6th in innovation.
Is that a cringe rating?
And I have a GPA of 3... And by all accounts, I'm ranked about 15th... Although the graphics are clearly a head above a lot of the top 5. Same goes for gameplay.
I'm not trying to elevate myself in any way, I'm just wondering how the ratings were put up. What criteria were used to evaluate the graphics, gameplay, etc.
Thank you for understanding!