itch.io

I see what you're getting at, and fiction and reality aren't in every case the same. But I'd still argue that fiction impacts reality in many ways. Take a look at disney princesses and barbie dolls for example- young girls see them and want to look like them, even be them. On the opposite hand, predators see illustrations of young girls doing inappropriate things, and they use that as inspiration to take advantage of them. A lot of things in anime people actually end up doing in real life, sometimes without even noticing. When you're immersed in that fictional world for so long, you kind of forget what those characters were initially made to represent. You're allowed to have your point of view, but when treading that fine line be aware of what kind of people you may be supporting or encouraging. Like some people making certain loli ""content"" might be actual predators themselves.

Edits: adding context + grammar issues

I think we both have different definitions of loli. The one that is more commonly used is one that specifically means underaged characters, not just adult ones that look somewhat young or are in a moe art style. The normalization of heinous crimes is REAL because I've seen it with my own eyes. I have unfortunately seen and attempted to report posts of sexualized art of literal INFANT babies, toddlers, ect. There is no way that that art is not pedophilic. Pedos will seek that out and make loli because it sexualizes the idea of being a child- whether real or fiction, it's icky. And supporting that kind of art is in a large way siding with the pedos. Plus things like furry porn is mostly made up species that are not able to be found anywhere in real life and have a significant amount of human traits, so it doesn't enable anything harmful because those creatures don't exist and can't be harmed, whereas children exist everywhere. If it's an elf girl with small tits, that's not exactly the same bc you can't find them irl so it's more excusable. (I personally think things like fake gore is okay, while others may not but child exploitation is an ABSOLUTE no in every circumstance... taking away the innocence of a helpless being is just the lowest of the low. ) Anywho, I suggest using different words like "petite" or "moe" to describe your interests since it drives less traction towards the disgusting side of the internet. 

 XD

Is Ren named after the RenPy software cause he's a.... well... very good at tech shall we say? Cause if he is I got a good chuckle from the clever choice. I can't wait for all 14 days to be available!! Keep up the great work!!

This is something you said in another comment: "I don't I think if it has to count as zoophile content it has to be a real animal we see in real life." So it applies to animals but not people? That's not fair. There are small women in real life, if you just like small women you don't have to call it "loli" unless you're actually into child characters which is basically p.dophilia but in fiction which is still really disgusting. Lolicon encourages real pedos to think sexualizing children is okay (it's not okay). Even if it's a fictional character, it still enables horrible people to sexualize something innocent and unable to consent at all. People complain about this enabling because affects real children