No problem! It helps a lot during my games so I figure I could share the love lol.
SebastianUXD
Creator of
Recent community posts
Fun with ChatGPT
“I’m playing a tabletop roleplaying game. The genre is horror. How can I describe a monster made of shadow to my tabletop roleplaying group?”
“Here is a possible way you could describe a monster made of shadow to your tabletop roleplaying group in a horror-themed tabletop roleplaying game:
’As you enter the dark and foreboding forest, you notice a strange and unsettling presence. It seems to lurk just beyond the edge of your vision, a shifting and writhing mass of darkness that seems to defy the laws of nature. As you move deeper into the forest, the darkness seems to grow thicker and more malevolent, and you catch glimpses of twisted, elongated shapes that seem to be made of pure shadow. You can sense an ancient and powerful evil emanating from these creatures, and you know that you must be cautious and prepared if you hope to survive their deadly embrace.’”
We’re almost at 200 downloads, here’s some AI images of cool scenes from this adventure:
Fighting a shadow beast
A writhing mass underground in the temple
A gathering of shadows, or faceless mystics
Black bear maybe, or another shadowbeast?
Tried to get a movie poster of the adventure, but would rather the character in front be faceless, smooth like an egg.
At the request of a fan on /r/L5R Discord, I made a school about culinary arts, with a focus in knives and bleeding attacks so they might fight into any adventure.
I was *this* close to making the attacks make it seem like this character fight like a silly anime character. Like, there's reckless charge that might cause the PC to fall prone if they fail, and there's pole vault which also has that effect, and laughing fox style is hilarious. And that was the original theme I was going for.... but I didn't want the player to feel silly in campaigns that didn't call for that kind of tone. Instead, I went for saying that this character learned how to use their knives skill to fend for themselves against hoodlums in the city.
Now... if you do want to go for that silly goofy anime character, replace the kata in rank 1 with Flexible Grip (Writ of the Wilds), Rank 3's Crashing Waves Style with Pole Vault (Courts of Stone), Rank 4's Laughing Fox Style with Tumbling Oak Style (Writ of the Wilds), and Rank 5's Striking as Void with Laughing Fox Style (Core Rule Book). Then you'll have a character who's clumsy in combat, makes other people fall over, make other people take damage meant for the PC, and sometimes pull through with something bad ass.
Differences between new and old version:
— Changed scoring to make it simpler (might be a mistake, we’ll see, nerfs “taste bias” imo).
— Added mechanics for ending the session that make it feel more like an anime episode.
— Added how someone could fail or get disqualified… but I don’t know, that might turn the game into “I can win by making you lose!” and honestly, is that balanced?
Feels ready to play test!
Howdy folks! Following up, the past couple of weeks has been busy and I didn’t have a lot of time to work on the adventure.
But, one big thing I figured out was how to plan out the “Loot”. The plan is that the “wheel of discord”, which is a thing from the CRB, will help randomize legendary and ancestral loot drops, while also guiding the GM on when to incorporate each PC’s “Quest”. Looking forward to seeing it in action.
For Rare and “Magic” loot, that’s determined by whether or not Adversaries and enhanced Minions were included in the encounter.
Basic Loot is included in every encounter and as background items you can search for during any scene.
That being said, this was a huge hurdle I needed to figure out in order to start planning the first session to an upcoming playtest. Should have more to add after next week, and I may have an update ready this week for the adventure preview.
A question that I need to answer: what happens when a PC critically strikes a mob?
for a single minion, when they suffer a critical strike they just die. And it would be fun to say that a critical strike could just instant kill a mob of minions, but I just don’t know how that effects the challenge of the encounter.
combat:
For minion mobs, do keep in mind that the trade off for the GM is that they’re trading action economy for simplicity. I probably wouldn’t put more than 3-5 minions in a single mob.
For planning combat, the conflict rank of your NPCs in the scene should total to be equal to or around the total school rank of your PCs. You can start to increase the total conflict rank by 1 per each loot above basic loot that each PC gains over the course of the campaign. For PC Shugenja, I almost feel like their school rank should be treated as double for the purposes of calculating balance vs NPC conflict rank.
I also like the idea of throwing out the gridded map entirely and using “Fate-Style” combat. Fate is another TTRPG, but I think it’s combat works well when we think about range bands for 5e L5R. What you do is, lay out a few index cards, these represent different sections or “zones” of the battlefield/arena/building that the conflict takes place in. Write down on each index card at least 2 ”aspects”, these are terrain qualities, traps, or something useful the PCs can use. Then the PCs might add a third quality if they spend Opportunities to do so. Then use tokens or write down the names of different mobs, adversaries, and PCs to track what sections they’re in. It takes 1 rangeband to get within range 0-1 of a target that shares the same zone as you, 2 rangebands if the target is using some kind of Aspect in that zone to give themselves height or obstacles. It takes 2 rangebands to move to another zone.
This is more flavor than mechanical, but I also like the idea of the Player describing their action rather than saying what action or technique they want to use. Since players should be rolling for their actions before the start of their turn, and they have access to all the information surrounding the NPCs, they should know exactly how to describe the outcome.
I’ll be posting ideas on how to make combat blazing fast here in the comments. This is leading up until I make a multipage document of this adventure.
Initiative: I have to look at how important the initiative roll is. I know there’s a technique Tactical Assessment that lets you spend opportunities on your initiative roll, but… I don’t know if that’s so important that the following will break anything.
Session-start initiative roll, have the players roll initiative once and then that’s their value for the rest of the session.
Or, every combat the players go first, then the enemies. This allows the players to go into a combat, and say that the Shugenja always gets to set up and then the Bushi get to follow up with their attacks. Also makes sure the enemies don’t just straight up gank the players before they have a chance to set up.
Are there any other references you pull up often during play that you wish you had as a cheat sheet?
Also, if it helps, here’s a website that has all the opportunities listed:
https://craneclan.weebly.com/5th-edition-opportunity-table.html
Change courtesy to compassion when considering what the lesser Bushido tenant is. I don’t know why I put courtesy, the YoRHa are all pretty polite and do follow a set of social rules. Compassion makes more sense since they can carry out their duty despite any emotional weight that should be behind it.
Hell yeah! This looks awesome: https://youtu.be/tj87ojB4y3A
I should only hope that running this adventure would look even half as cool as this in mind.
Another mention of Shikigami in anime is Jujutsu Kaisen I believe. This guy had wolves and birds and such, it was pretty cool.
2 hours too long? Here is a tightly edited, 45 minute version of the CourtGames playtest video:
https://youtu.be/tZHzyGoMCG8
Or, just looking for CourtGames’ thoughts on the GM20Qs?
https://youtu.be/UaXExwNksTU