Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

List of requests to the developer for January 2025 :)

A topic by EldanR created 17 days ago Views: 87 Replies: 7
Viewing posts 1 to 2

1) Visualization of the sticks position on the screen during the flight. I have already supported this request of one of your clients in the topic https://itch.io/t/173216/stick-indicators

2) Assigning the "low/high rates" option to a keyboard shortcut. This has already been discussed here https://itch.io/t/19821/how-to-fly-a-fpv-quadcopter-racing-drone I even asked to leave this option and not remove it. ;)

3) And finally, in the readings of all parameters in the settings, make a window with numbers, and on the right - up/down arrows. Something like this...


It will be easier to assign a digital value: without moving the slider, but by clicking on the arrows, or directly entering the desired number from the keyboard in the window.

Best regards, Dan.

Developer(+1)

Thank you for the list! I will add it to my list of suggestions and consider it for future updates.

Thank you too for the wonderful program! :) By the way, if you allow me, one more remark... ;) It would probably be nice if the currently active preset was highlighted. So that it would be immediately clear - with what settings we are flying ))

(1 edit)

Hello again! :) Sorry for being so annoying... )) I never tire of admiring the program :) Oh, it's just a pity that the desert from the Classic version is not in the Recharged one. Honestly, I like it better. And it would probably be even better if there were two variants: just with sand and gates - for beginners, and with rocks - for experienced flyers :) But then, I'm afraid that the size of the program will increase and will not fit into the Ubuntu limit (if there is one, I don't know, I'm an absolute layman in such matters).

I also noticed this thing... When you finish a race (flight) in the level editor and go back to the list of levels, you ALWAYS end up somewhere at the beginning of this list. Although, in my opinion, it would be more logical if you were on the same level where you flew. And then, at will, you go up or down the list, and fly again ))

By the way, following your advice, I scoured the entire Internet, found and downloaded a bunch of levels (HUGE thanks to those enthusiasts who took the time to do them). Now I have a pretty impressive, long list ))

But I can't do it myself yet. I can't even understand how to edit (again, on your advice). Of course, I read the instructions... But... It's obvious that I'm such a clumsy person ))) I need to look for videos on this topic. And they should be thorough. And what I found - everything is shown at such a fast pace that it's unclear: what and where to click-move.

With respect, Dan.

Developer(+1)

Thank you for your feedback and suggestions! Regarding the level editor, it's probably easiest if you start small - start by loading an existing level and just play around by moving some objects a bit. Maybe try to delete some stuff. As long as you save the level with a new name you don't have to worry about messing things up. I think after a while you will find that the level editing is pretty easy, it can even be fun in itself :)

Maybe this video can be a good starting point: 

By the way, I also noticed something else... In the first, classic, versions of the program, the camera tilt angle is adjusted as if it is on top of the device, like in tiny whoops. Now, in a later, different version, Recharged, it is adjusted as if it is below, in suspension )))

Another suggestion arises... Two small windows (one for the top, the other for the bottom), you can check only one of them, making a choice, and then adjust the tilt angle.

I think, in this way, you will anticipate the preferences of all users ;)

Probably, I have already gotten to you with my suggestions and observations... ))

I hope that you will not be offended, but will understand my activity ;)

Best wishes, Dan.

Developer

Hmm the camera tilt angle is exactly the same the same in both version, at least that is my intention. In what way do you mean that it is different?

It will be difficult to explain, I just got this feeling))

This is what we say in such cases: “When it seems like it, you need to be baptized” :) I hope Google translator translated it correctly))