Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

Pacts & Blades

A minimalist sword and witchcraft RPG for campaigns and quick sessions · By Lucas Rolim

Couple of errors in the character sheet

A topic by Claes created May 04, 2020 Views: 572 Replies: 11
Viewing posts 1 to 5

Super interesting game! I found some errors in the character sheet.

Creating a character, number 3: It says "Wrote the result...". I think it should be "Write the result...".

Damage: It says  "1 a 3", "4 a 5". Should it be "1 to 3" and "4 to 5"?

Developer

Thank you, I'm working on it right now!

Also it's a bit inconsistent with the rule book. In the book it refers to "light damage" but on the sheet it says "easy damage". I think you should use "light" and maybe call it "wounds". So for example if you roll a 6 for health you would get 6 light wounds, 3 average wounds and 2 severe wounds. I would even rename "average wounds" to something else like "serious wounds". Average sounds a bit strange when referring to wounds and damage.

Developer

Yes, it's being reviewed right now. These inconsistencies did appear, but I hope to correct them today.

Developer

You will be cited as a special thank you in this revised version.

Developer

Claes, a new version of 40 pages and completely revised, is available. Check your emails.

(1 edit)

The new version is great! I love it!

There are still some errors in the character sheet:

Creating a character, step 3:
It still says Wrote. I think it should be Write.
Also, a semicolon is missing after Light at the end of the sentence.

Tests, step 2:
It says Path abilities(advancement). A space missing between abilities and the parentheses.

Damage:
It says 1 a 3 and 4 a 5. I think a should be replaced with to. And maybe it should say wound instead of dmg.

Developer

Thanks again!!

It would be nice to have a field on the character sheet for the difficulty to be hit by an opponent (described on page 24 of the revised edition).

Developer

I see it now, and it is an excellent idea, and makes tottally sense with the inverse progression of the system. Thanks again.

Developer

You are the best man!! If you are interested I can totally send you a proff copy before the def, one!

I really like the game and its rules so I'm happy to help. I would definitely like to read the proff copy, so send that and I can read it and get back to you with comments.