Neat and uncomfortable idea. Is there a 'balanced' ending? I tried so many combinations haha.

I really wanted to answer "it depends" to most of the questions, but I chose to kill, because I'm pretty bad at "accepting my fate".

Nice concept, though I feel like most of the questions were pretty much the same, and thus there is no particular middle ground between kill and die.

Also, I like when games encourage me to reflect on myself, but the text at the end was... a bit too much.

Definitely an interesting concept, some of the questions can make you think. There definitely could be an way to extend this to a full game.

Ethical choices are a complicated things, especially in games. It is therefore very interesting, but also easy to have it go wrong.

Altough I didn't want to, I happened to kill every one because there was no way to talk it out and "die" is really not an option for me. Especially if it's just for one stranger's kid to get to a good school.
You say I need help because I killed everyone, but everyone wanted to kill me so who can I ask for help? :'(

Also, according to the question, my fate is to die. Are you the one who contracted all these people to kill me? :o

I restarted the game several times and if I understood correctly, there is no good end in the final ? In any case, the concept of the game is interesting. It would have been nice to add a little music.