3 entries were submitted between 2022-10-15 03:59:00 and 2022-10-30 03:59:00. 4 ratings were given to 3 entries (100.0%) between 2022-10-30 03:59:00 and 2022-11-04 04:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 1.3 and the median was 1.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well did the game follow the theme | #1 | 5.000 | 5.000 |
| Overall uniqueness of the game concept | #1 | 5.000 | 5.000 |
| Were game visuals objectively good or inventive | #1 | 5.000 | 5.000 |
| Quality and fit of sounds and sound effects to the game | #1 | 5.000 | 5.000 |
| Unexpected or surprising elements in the game | #1 | 5.000 | 5.000 |
| Overall | #1 | 4.833 | 4.833 |
| Cohesiveness of game elements | #2 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Were game visuals objectively good or inventive | #1 | 5.000 | 5.000 |
| Cohesiveness of game elements | #1 | 5.000 | 5.000 |
| Overall | #2 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Quality and fit of sounds and sound effects to the game | #2 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Unexpected or surprising elements in the game | #2 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Overall uniqueness of the game concept | #3 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| How well did the game follow the theme | #3 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well did the game follow the theme | #1 | 5.000 | 5.000 |
| Overall uniqueness of the game concept | #2 | 4.500 | 4.500 |
| Cohesiveness of game elements | #3 | 2.500 | 2.500 |
| Quality and fit of sounds and sound effects to the game | #3 | 2.000 | 2.000 |
| Unexpected or surprising elements in the game | #3 | 2.500 | 2.500 |
| Were game visuals objectively good or inventive | #3 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Overall | #3 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
