I was kind of impressed with how the VN managed to tell its story despite the self-imposed limitation of no narration, nothing but dialogue. It was an interesting exercise, but I wouldn't say it really worked. Unfortunately, because of this decision, the VN is forced to skip from scene to scene not based on what it would make most sense to show, but based on which scenes can actually be delivered through dialogue alone.
The story was mostly enjoyable, except for the ending. Not only by the end was I pretty fatigued, but the resolution to the climax is basically handed to the protagonists without them having to do anything for it. It's pretty unsatisfying.
I must confess, the parts that stuck out the most to me were the commentary on the American welfare state. In two situations the protagonist gets screwed over by the way the American welfare system works (private healthcare and no paid sick days), but both times he gets bailed out because of the generosity of the people he interacts with. I don't know if this is a political statement of sorts, but as an outsider looking in it was certainly interesting and memorable.